
Radeon 625 vs Radeon R7 430

Radeon 625
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 430
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 625 is positioned at rank 357 and the Radeon R7 430 is on rank 99, so the Radeon R7 430 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 625
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 430
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 625 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 625 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 430 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 430 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 625.
| Insight | Radeon 625 | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 430 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $50 for the Radeon 625, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 238.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 625 | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+238.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 625 and Radeon R7 430

Radeon 625
The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

Radeon R7 430
The Radeon R7 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 625 scores 1,077 and the Radeon R7 430 reaches 1,093 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 625 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R7 430 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 625) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 430). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 430). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 625 | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,077 | 1,093+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+154% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz+5% | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 256 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 625 | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 625) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 430) — the Radeon R7 430 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 625 | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 625 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 430's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 625 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 625) vs 300W (Radeon R7 430). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon 625 | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-50% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 21.5+97% | 10.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 625 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R7 430 launched at $79 and now averages $15. The Radeon R7 430 costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.5 (Radeon 625) vs 72.9 (Radeon R7 430) — the Radeon R7 430 offers 239.1% better value. The Radeon 625 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 625 | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $79-21% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5 | 72.9+239% |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Trinidad |
| Release | May 13 2019 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #858 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












