Radeon 625 vs Radeon R7 430

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 625 vs Radeon R7 430 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 625 vs Radeon R7 430: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 625

2019

Why buy it

✅Radeon R7 430 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 625 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 430 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
26.6% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 13.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon R7 430

2015

Why buy it

✅114.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.8 vs 10.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 430 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 114.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (1,093 vs 1,077), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 625 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 430 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $21 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 28.5% (13.8 vs 10.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 430 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 625 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 625 vs Radeon R7 430 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 625

The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

Radeon R7 430

The Radeon R7 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 625 scores 1,077 and the Radeon R7 430 reaches 1,093 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 625 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R7 430 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 625) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 430). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 430). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 430
G3D Mark Score	1,077	1,093+1%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	1.997 TFLOPS+154%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz+5%	975 MHz
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	64+167%
L1 Cache	96 KB	256 KB+167%
L2 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 430
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon 625 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 430. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 625) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 430) — the Radeon R7 430 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 430
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 625 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 430's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 625 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 625) vs 300W (Radeon R7 430). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 430
TDP	50W-50%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	21.5+97%	10.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 625 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 430 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon R7 430 was 21% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.8 (Radeon 625) vs 13.8 (Radeon R7 430) — the Radeon R7 430 offers 27.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 625 (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 430
MSRP	$100	$79-21%
Performance per Dollar	10.8	13.8+28%
Codename	Polaris 24	Trinidad
Release	May 13 2019	June 18 2015
Ranking	#858	#467

Search Radeon 625 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 430 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.