HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon 625

HD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 625

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon 625 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon 625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon 625

2019

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • HD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 625 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
HD Graphics 630 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (1,111 vs 1,077), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 625 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
HD Graphics 630 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $100 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3.2% (11.1 vs 10.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, HD Graphics 630 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 625 has the stronger long-term case.

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon 625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

HD Graphics 630

The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.

AMD

Radeon 625

The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the Radeon 625 reaches 1,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon 625 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 384 (Radeon 625). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureHD Graphics 630Radeon 625
G3D Mark Score
1,111+3%
1,077
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm++
28 nm
Shading Units
192
384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.384 TFLOPS
0.7864 TFLOPS+105%
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1024 MHz+2%
ROPs
3
8+167%
TMUs
24
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 630Radeon 625
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 625 carries 512 MB. Radeon 625 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 630 and 128-bit on the Radeon 625.

FeatureHD Graphics 630Radeon 625
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Radeon 625's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Radeon 625). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureHD Graphics 630Radeon 625
TDP
15W-70%
50W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
74.1+245%
21.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the HD Graphics 630 came in at $100, while the Radeon 625 launched at $100. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (HD Graphics 630) vs 10.8 (Radeon 625) — the HD Graphics 630 offers 2.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 625 (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureHD Graphics 630Radeon 625
MSRP
$100
$100
Performance per Dollar
11.1+3%
10.8
Codename
Kaby Lake GT2
Polaris 24
Release
January 1 2017
May 13 2019
Ranking
#823
#858

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.