
HD Graphics 630

Radeon 625
HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon 625 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon 625 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon 625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
HD Graphics 630
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon 625
2019Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅HD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 625 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon 625 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

HD Graphics 630
The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.

Radeon 625
The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the Radeon 625 reaches 1,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon 625 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 384 (Radeon 625). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,111+3% | 1,077 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+105% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1024 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 3 | 8+167% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 625 carries 512 MB. Radeon 625 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 630 and 128-bit on the Radeon 625.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Radeon 625's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Radeon 625). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 74.1+245% | 21.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the HD Graphics 630 came in at $100, while the Radeon 625 launched at $100. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (HD Graphics 630) vs 10.8 (Radeon 625) — the HD Graphics 630 offers 2.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 625 (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1+3% | 10.8 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | January 1 2017 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #823 | #858 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















