
HD Graphics 630
Popular choices:

Radeon 625
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
HD Graphics 630
2017Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon 625
2019Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics 630: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- β More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014β2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βPoor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- β233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
HD Graphics 630
2017Radeon 625
2019Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics 630: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- β More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014β2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- βPoor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- β233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is HD Graphics 630 better than Radeon 625?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 625 make more sense than HD Graphics 630?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 630 and Radeon 625

HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.

Radeon 625
Radeon 625
The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the Radeon 625 reaches 1,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon 625 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 384 (Radeon 625). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,111+3% | 1,077 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+105% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1024 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 3 | 8+167% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 625 has 512 MB. The Radeon 625 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Radeon 625's 50W β a 107.7% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Radeon 625). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 74.1+245% | 21.5 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 630 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Radeon 625 launched at $100. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (HD Graphics 630) vs 10.8 (Radeon 625) β the HD Graphics 630 offers 2.8% better value. The Radeon 625 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1+3% | 10.8 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | January 1 2017 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #823 | #858 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













