Quadro 2100M vs Radeon 625

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2100M vs Radeon 625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2100M vs Radeon 625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2100M

2013

Why buy it

✅17.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon 625

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Quadro 2100M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 625 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 2100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 2100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (1,100 vs 1,077), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 625 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 625 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro 2100M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro 2100M vs Radeon 625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2100M

The Quadro 2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points. Launch price was $84.95.

Radeon 625

The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2100M scores 1,100 and the Radeon 625 reaches 1,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 625 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 576 (Quadro 2100M) vs 384 (Radeon 625). Raw compute: 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro 2100M) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625).

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon 625
G3D Mark Score	1,100+2%	1,077
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	576+50%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7684 TFLOPS	0.7864 TFLOPS+2%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	48+100%	24
L1 Cache	48 KB	96 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon 625
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2100M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 625 carries 512 MB. Quadro 2100M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2100M and 128-bit on the Radeon 625. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2100M) vs 128 KB (Radeon 625) — the Quadro 2100M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon 625
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2100M draws 55W versus the Radeon 625's 50W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon 625 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2100M) vs 350W (Radeon 625). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon 625
TDP	55W	50W-9%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	20.0	21.5+8%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 625 (2019 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon 625
MSRP	—	$100
Codename	GK106	Polaris 24
Release	July 23 2013	May 13 2019
Ranking	#788	#858

Search Quadro 2100M on Amazon

Search Radeon 625 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.