Quadro 2100M vs Radeon 625
Quadro 2100M
Popular choices:
Radeon 625
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2100M is positioned at rank 107 and the Radeon 625 is on rank 357, so the Quadro 2100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2100M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 625
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 625 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Radeon 625 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 2100M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2100M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 625.
| Insight | Quadro 2100M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 2100M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2100M and Radeon 625
Quadro 2100M
The Quadro 2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points. Launch price was $84.95.
Radeon 625
The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2100M scores 1,100 and the Radeon 625 reaches 1,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 625 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 576 (Quadro 2100M) vs 384 (Radeon 625). Raw compute: 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro 2100M) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625).
| Feature | Quadro 2100M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,100+2% | 1,077 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 576+50% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7684 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+2% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 96 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2100M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2100M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 625 has 512 MB. The Quadro 2100M offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2100M) vs 128 KB (Radeon 625) — the Quadro 2100M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 2100M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2100M draws 55W versus the Radeon 625's 50W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon 625 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2100M) vs 350W (Radeon 625). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 2100M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 50W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0 | 21.5+8% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 625 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro 2100M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | GK106 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #788 | #858 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2100M and Radeon 625
