Quadro 2100M vs Radeon R9 M275

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2100M vs Radeon R9 M275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2100M vs Radeon R9 M275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2100M

2013

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M275 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M275

2014

Why buy it

✅5.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M275 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (1,115 vs 1,100), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 2100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M275 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M275 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2100M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2100M vs Radeon R9 M275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2100M

The Quadro 2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points. Launch price was $84.95.

Radeon R9 M275

The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2100M scores 1,100 and the Radeon R9 M275 reaches 1,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M275 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 576 (Quadro 2100M) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275). Raw compute: 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro 2100M) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275).

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon R9 M275
G3D Mark Score	1,100	1,115+1%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	576	640+11%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7684 TFLOPS	1.184 TFLOPS+54%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	48+20%	40
L1 Cache	48 KB	160 KB+233%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon R9 M275
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2100M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275 carries 512 MB. Quadro 2100M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2100M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275.

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon R9 M275
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2100M draws 55W versus the Radeon R9 M275's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Quadro 2100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2100M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon R9 M275
TDP	55W-27%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	20.0+34%	14.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R9 M275 (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon R9 M275
MSRP	—	$300
Codename	GK106	Venus
Release	July 23 2013	January 28 2014
Ranking	#788	#851

Search Quadro 2100M on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M275 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.