Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon 625

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon 625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon 625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 50W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 10.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon 625

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 100.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 625 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌614.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 625 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,077 vs 1,072), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 625 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 625 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 100.9% (10.8 vs 5.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon 625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.

Radeon 625

The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU scores 1,072 and the Radeon 625 reaches 1,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon 625
G3D Mark Score	1,072	1,077
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon 625
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 625 carries 512 MB. Radeon 625 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU and 128-bit on the Radeon 625.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon 625
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon 625's 50W — a 150.9% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 350W (Radeon 625). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon 625
TDP	7W-86%	50W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	153.1+612%	21.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU came in at $200, while the Radeon 625 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon 625 was 50% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 10.8 (Radeon 625) — the Radeon 625 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 625 (2019 vs 2018).

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon 625
MSRP	$200	$100-50%
Performance per Dollar	5.4	10.8+100%
Codename	—	Polaris 24
Release	December 6 2018	May 13 2019
Ranking	#860	#858

Search Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU on Amazon

Search Radeon 625 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.