CPU
GPU
GeForce 920MX
Popular choices:
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 920MX is positioned at rank 360 and the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is on rank 465, so the GeForce 920MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 920MX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 920MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 920MX | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 920MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $54 versus $100 for the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU, it costs 46% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 83.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 920MX | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+83.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($54) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920MX and Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
GeForce 920MX
The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 and the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU reaches 1,072 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,064 | 1,072 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 920MX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU has 0 MB. The GeForce 920MX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU's 7W — a 78.3% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W | 7W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 66.5 | 153.1+130% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 920MX launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $54, while the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU launched at $200 and now averages $100. The GeForce 920MX costs 46% less ($46 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) vs 10.7 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) — the GeForce 920MX offers 84.1% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-50% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $54-46% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.7+84% | 10.7 |
| Codename | GM108 | — |
| Release | March 25 2016 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #864 | #860 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 920MX and Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
