GeForce 920MX
VS
Radeon R7 430

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 430

NVIDIA

GeForce 920MX

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 430

2015Boost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 920MX is positioned at rank 360 and the Radeon R7 430 is on rank 99, so the Radeon R7 430 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX

#350
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1020%
#352
925%
#353
923%
#357
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
839%
#358
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
833%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
100%
#361
100%
#362
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
99%
#363
Radeon Vega 8
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#367
GeForce 615
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
95%
#369
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
94%
#370
GeForce GT 730A
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
93%
#372
Radeon HD 7660G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
90%
#373
Radeon R7 M270DX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
90%
#374
Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
90%
#375
Radeon 620
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 430

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
524%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
504%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
498%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
497%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
496%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
493%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
487%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
485%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
480%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
479%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
473%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
472%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
464%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
464%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
100%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
89%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
88%
#84
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
578%
#99
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
100%
#101
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
98%
#102
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
97%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
94%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
91%
#107
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
85%
#108
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
85%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
85%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
82%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
81%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 430 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 920MX.

InsightGeForce 920MXRadeon R7 430
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)
Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 430 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 430 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $54), it costs 72% less, resulting in a 269.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 920MXRadeon R7 430
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+269.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($54)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920MX and Radeon R7 430

NVIDIA

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 430

The Radeon R7 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 and the Radeon R7 430 reaches 1,093 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920MX is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 430 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920MX) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 430). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 430). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 920MXRadeon R7 430
G3D Mark Score
1,064
1,093+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
1024+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+293%
Boost Clock
993 MHz+2%
975 MHz
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L1 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 920MXRadeon R7 430
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 430) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 920MXRadeon R7 430
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the Radeon R7 430's 100W — a 144.8% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 300W (Radeon R7 430). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureGeForce 920MXRadeon R7 430
TDP
16W-84%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Perf/Watt
66.5+510%
10.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 920MX launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $54, while the Radeon R7 430 launched at $79 and now averages $15. The Radeon R7 430 costs 72.2% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) vs 72.9 (Radeon R7 430) — the Radeon R7 430 offers 270.1% better value. The GeForce 920MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 920MXRadeon R7 430
MSRP
$100
$79-21%
Avg Price (30d)
$54
$15-72%
Performance per Dollar
19.7
72.9+270%
Codename
GM108
Trinidad
Release
March 25 2016
June 18 2015
Ranking
#864
#467