GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 430

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 430 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 430: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920MX

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 16W instead of 100W, a 84W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 430 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
26.6% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 13.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon R7 430

2015

Why buy it

✅57.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.8 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌525% higher power demand at 100W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 430 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 57.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (1,093 vs 1,064), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 920MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 430 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $21 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 30% (13.8 vs 10.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 430 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 920MX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 430 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

Radeon R7 430

The Radeon R7 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 and the Radeon R7 430 reaches 1,093 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920MX is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 430 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920MX) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 430). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 430). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 430
G3D Mark Score	1,064	1,093+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	1024+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	1.997 TFLOPS+293%
Boost Clock	993 MHz+2%	975 MHz
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	64+167%
L1 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 430 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 430
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920MX and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 430. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 430) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 430
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the Radeon R7 430's 100W — a 144.8% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 300W (Radeon R7 430). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 430
TDP	16W-84%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	66.5+510%	10.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 920MX came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 430 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon R7 430 was 21% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (GeForce 920MX) vs 13.8 (Radeon R7 430) — the Radeon R7 430 offers 30.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 920MX (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 430
MSRP	$100	$79-21%
Performance per Dollar	10.6	13.8+30%
Codename	GM108	Trinidad
Release	March 25 2016	June 18 2015
Ranking	#864	#467

Search GeForce 920MX on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 430 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.