GeForce 920MX vs Radeon 625

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon 625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon 625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920MX

2016

Why buy it

✅36.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 16W instead of 50W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon 625

2019

Why buy it

✅GeForce 920MX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 625 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 920MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌212.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 920MX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 625 instead at 1,077 vs 1,064, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 625 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 625 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $100 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.2% (10.8 vs 10.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce 920MX still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon 625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

Radeon 625

The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 and the Radeon 625 reaches 1,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920MX is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 625 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920MX) vs 384 (Radeon 625). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon 625
G3D Mark Score	1,064	1,077+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	0.7864 TFLOPS+55%
Boost Clock	993 MHz	1024 MHz+3%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 625 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon 625
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920MX and 128-bit on the Radeon 625. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon 625) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon 625
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the Radeon 625's 50W — a 103% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 350W (Radeon 625). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon 625
TDP	16W-68%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	66.5+209%	21.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 920MX came in at $100, while the Radeon 625 launched at $100. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (GeForce 920MX) vs 10.8 (Radeon 625) — the Radeon 625 offers 1.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 625 (2019 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon 625
MSRP	$100	$100
Performance per Dollar	10.6	10.8+2%
Codename	GM108	Polaris 24
Release	March 25 2016	May 13 2019
Ranking	#864	#858

Search GeForce 920MX on Amazon

Search Radeon 625 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.