FirePro W4170M vs GeForce 920MX

FirePro W4170M

2015Core: 825 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 920MX

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W4170M vs GeForce 920MX Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4170M vs GeForce 920MX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4170M

2015

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 837.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 16W.

GeForce 920MX

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 16W instead of 150W, a 134W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 920MX is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (1,064 vs 1,052), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W4170M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 920MX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 920MX is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W4170M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W4170M vs GeForce 920MX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W4170M

The FirePro W4170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4170M scores 1,052 and the GeForce 920MX reaches 1,064 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4170M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 920MX uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro W4170M) vs 256 (GeForce 920MX). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro W4170M) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 993 MHz.

FeatureFirePro W4170MGeForce 920MX
G3D Mark Score
1,052
1,064+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+50%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS+36%
0.5084 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
900 MHz
993 MHz+10%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
96 KB
128 KB+33%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W4170M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W4170MGeForce 920MX
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4170M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 920MX carries 512 MB. FirePro W4170M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4170M and 128-bit on the GeForce 920MX. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4170M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W4170MGeForce 920MX
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (FirePro W4170M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 920MX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro W4170MGeForce 920MX
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W4170M) vs None (GeForce 920MX). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W4170M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 920MX).

FeatureFirePro W4170MGeForce 920MX
Encoder
VCE 1.0
None
Decoder
UVD 4.0
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4170M draws 150W versus the GeForce 920MX's 16W — a 161.4% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4170M) vs 350W (GeForce 920MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro W4170MGeForce 920MX
TDP
150W
16W-89%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
7.0
66.5+850%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 920MX (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W4170MGeForce 920MX
MSRP
$100
Codename
Opal
GM108
Release
April 23 2015
March 25 2016
Ranking
#868
#864

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.