
Firepro M4100

FirePro W4170M
Firepro M4100 vs FirePro W4170M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Firepro M4100 vs FirePro W4170M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Firepro M4100 vs FirePro W4170M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Firepro M4100
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
FirePro W4170M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Firepro M4100 vs FirePro W4170M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Firepro M4100
The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

FirePro W4170M
The FirePro W4170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro M4100 scores 1,059 and the FirePro W4170M reaches 1,052 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro M4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro W4170M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Firepro M4100) vs 384 (FirePro W4170M). Raw compute: 0.5146 TFLOPS (Firepro M4100) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro W4170M).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | FirePro W4170M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,059 | 1,052 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5146 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS+34% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | FirePro W4170M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro M4100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W4170M carries 4 GB. FirePro W4170M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro M4100 and 64-bit on the FirePro W4170M.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | FirePro W4170M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro M4100) vs 12 (11_1) (FirePro W4170M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | FirePro W4170M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Firepro M4100) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W4170M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (Firepro M4100) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W4170M).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | FirePro W4170M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro M4100 draws 30W versus the FirePro W4170M's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Firepro M4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro M4100) vs 350W (FirePro W4170M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 82mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | FirePro W4170M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-80% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 82mm | 0mm |
| Height | 70mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.3+404% | 7.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is FirePro W4170M (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | FirePro W4170M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | Mars | Opal |
| Release | October 16 2013 | April 23 2015 |
| Ranking | #866 | #868 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















