Firepro M4100 vs GeForce 920MX

CPU

GPU

Firepro M4100

2013Core: 670 MHz

GeForce 920MX

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Firepro M4100

1,059

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce 920MX

1,064

+0.5%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX

#350

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1020%

#352

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

925%

#353

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

923%

#357

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

839%

#358

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

833%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

100%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

100%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

99%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

95%

#369

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

94%

#370

GeForce GT 730A

MSRP: $75|Avg: $20

93%

#372

Radeon HD 7660G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

90%

#373

Radeon R7 M270DX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

90%

#374

Radeon HD 6670/7670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

90%

#375

Radeon 620

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 920MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Firepro M4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Firepro M4100	GeForce 920MX
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Firepro M4100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Firepro M4100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $54), it costs 44% less, resulting in a 79.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Firepro M4100	GeForce 920MX
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+79.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($54)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Firepro M4100 Benchmark Check

GeForce 920MX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Firepro M4100 and GeForce 920MX

Firepro M4100

The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Firepro M4100 scores 1,059 and the GeForce 920MX reaches 1,064 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro M4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 920MX uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Firepro M4100) vs 256 (GeForce 920MX). Raw compute: 0.5146 TFLOPS (Firepro M4100) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX).

Feature	Firepro M4100	GeForce 920MX
G3D Mark Score	1,059	1,064
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384+50%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5146 TFLOPS+1%	0.5084 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	128 KB+33%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Firepro M4100	GeForce 920MX
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Firepro M4100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 920MX has 512 MB. The Firepro M4100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Firepro M4100) vs 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Firepro M4100	GeForce 920MX
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro M4100) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 920MX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

Feature	Firepro M4100	GeForce 920MX
DirectX	12 (FL11_1)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2+9%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Firepro M4100) vs None (GeForce 920MX). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (Firepro M4100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 920MX).

Feature	Firepro M4100	GeForce 920MX
Encoder	VCE 1.0	None
Decoder	UVD 4.0	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro M4100 draws 30W versus the GeForce 920MX's 16W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro M4100) vs 350W (GeForce 920MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Firepro M4100	GeForce 920MX
TDP	30W	16W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	82mm	—
Height	70mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	35.3	66.5+88%

💰

Value Analysis

The Firepro M4100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce 920MX launched at $100 and now averages $54. The Firepro M4100 costs 44.4% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.3 (Firepro M4100) vs 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) — the Firepro M4100 offers 79.2% better value. The GeForce 920MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).