CPU
GPU
Firepro M4100
Popular choices:
Radeon 625
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 625
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 625 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Radeon 625 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Firepro M4100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 625 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Firepro M4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Firepro M4100 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Firepro M4100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $50 for the Radeon 625, it costs 40% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 63.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Firepro M4100 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+63.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Firepro M4100 and Radeon 625
Firepro M4100
The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.
Radeon 625
The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro M4100 scores 1,059 and the Radeon 625 reaches 1,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro M4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 625 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Firepro M4100) vs 384 (Radeon 625). Raw compute: 0.5146 TFLOPS (Firepro M4100) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,059 | 1,077+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5146 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+53% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro M4100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 625 has 512 MB. The Firepro M4100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Firepro M4100) vs 128 KB (Radeon 625) — the Firepro M4100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro M4100 draws 30W versus the Radeon 625's 50W — a 50% difference. The Firepro M4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro M4100) vs 350W (Radeon 625). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 70mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 35.3+64% | 21.5 |
Value Analysis
The Firepro M4100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon 625 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Firepro M4100 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.3 (Firepro M4100) vs 21.5 (Radeon 625) — the Firepro M4100 offers 64.2% better value. The Radeon 625 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.3+64% | 21.5 |
| Codename | Mars | Polaris 24 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #866 | #858 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Firepro M4100 and Radeon 625
