Firepro M4100 vs Radeon 625

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Firepro M4100 vs Radeon 625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Firepro M4100 vs Radeon 625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Firepro M4100

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon 625

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Firepro M4100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 625 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 625 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (1,077 vs 1,059), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 625 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 625 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Firepro M4100 vs Radeon 625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Firepro M4100

The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

Radeon 625

The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Firepro M4100 scores 1,059 and the Radeon 625 reaches 1,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro M4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 625 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Firepro M4100) vs 384 (Radeon 625). Raw compute: 0.5146 TFLOPS (Firepro M4100) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625).

Feature	Firepro M4100	Radeon 625
G3D Mark Score	1,059	1,077+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5146 TFLOPS	0.7864 TFLOPS+53%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Firepro M4100	Radeon 625
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Firepro M4100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 625 carries 512 MB. Firepro M4100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro M4100 and 128-bit on the Radeon 625. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Firepro M4100) vs 128 KB (Radeon 625) — the Firepro M4100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Firepro M4100	Radeon 625
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro M4100 draws 30W versus the Radeon 625's 50W — a 50% difference. The Firepro M4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro M4100) vs 350W (Radeon 625). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Firepro M4100	Radeon 625
TDP	30W-40%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	82mm	—
Height	70mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	35.3+64%	21.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Firepro M4100 came in at $0, while the Radeon 625 launched at $100. On MSRP, Firepro M4100 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Firepro M4100) vs 10.8 (Radeon 625) — the Firepro M4100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 625 (2019 vs 2013).

Feature	Firepro M4100	Radeon 625
MSRP	$0-100%	$100
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	10.8
Codename	Mars	Polaris 24
Release	October 16 2013	May 13 2019
Ranking	#866	#858

Search Firepro M4100 on Amazon

Search Radeon 625 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.