Firepro M4100
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Firepro M4100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Firepro M4100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Firepro M4100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Firepro M4100
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Firepro M4100 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 30W vs 7W.
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 30W, a 23W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Firepro M4100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Firepro M4100
The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro M4100 scores 1,059 and the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU reaches 1,072 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,059 | 1,072+1% |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro M4100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU carries 0 MB. Firepro M4100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro M4100 and System on the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro M4100 draws 30W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU's 7W — a 124.3% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro M4100) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 7W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 70mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 35.3 | 153.1+334% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Firepro M4100 came in at $0, while the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU launched at $200. On MSRP, Firepro M4100 was 100+% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Firepro M4100) vs 5.4 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) — the Firepro M4100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 5.4 |
| Codename | Mars | — |
| Release | October 16 2013 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #866 | #860 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Firepro M4100 and Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
