
Firepro M4100

Radeon HD 8750M
Firepro M4100 vs Radeon HD 8750M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Firepro M4100 vs Radeon HD 8750M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Firepro M4100 vs Radeon HD 8750M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Firepro M4100
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 8750M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Firepro M4100 vs Radeon HD 8750M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Firepro M4100
The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

Radeon HD 8750M
The Radeon HD 8750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 26 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 670 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro M4100 scores 1,059 and the Radeon HD 8750M reaches 1,052 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro M4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8750M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Firepro M4100) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8750M). Raw compute: 0.5146 TFLOPS (Firepro M4100) vs 0.5146 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8750M).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,059 | 1,052 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5146 TFLOPS | 0.5146 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro M4100 and System on the Radeon HD 8750M.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro M4100) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8750M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Firepro M4100) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8750M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (Firepro M4100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 8750M).
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro M4100 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 8750M's 50W — a 50% difference. The Firepro M4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro M4100) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8750M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Firepro M4100 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 70mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.3+68% | 21.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















