
FirePro W4170M

Mobility Radeon HD 5870
FirePro W4170M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W4170M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W4170M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W4170M
2015Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4170M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W4170M
The FirePro W4170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 5870
The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,088 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W4170M scores 1,052 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 reaches 1,088 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4170M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro W4170M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5870). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro W4170M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5870).
| Feature | FirePro W4170M | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,052 | 1,088+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+62% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+20% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W4170M | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W4170M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 carries 1 GB. FirePro W4170M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4170M and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 5870.
| Feature | FirePro W4170M | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (FirePro W4170M) vs 11 (5.0) (Mobility Radeon HD 5870). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W4170M | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1)+9% | 11 (5.0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W4170M) vs None (Mobility Radeon HD 5870). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W4170M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 5870).
| Feature | FirePro W4170M | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4170M draws 150W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 5870's 50W — a 100% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4170M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5870). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro W4170M | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.0 | 21.8+211% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is FirePro W4170M (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro W4170M | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | Opal | Broadway |
| Release | April 23 2015 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #868 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















