FirePro W4170M vs Radeon HD 6750

FirePro W4170M

2015Core: 825 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6750

2011Boost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W4170M vs Radeon HD 6750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4170M vs Radeon HD 6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4170M

2015

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
  • 74.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 86W.

Radeon HD 6750

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 86W instead of 150W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W4170M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (1,052 vs 1,046), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W4170M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6750 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W4170M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W4170M vs Radeon HD 6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W4170M

The FirePro W4170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6750

The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4170M scores 1,052 and the Radeon HD 6750 reaches 1,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4170M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro W4170M) vs 720 (Radeon HD 6750). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro W4170M) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureFirePro W4170MRadeon HD 6750
G3D Mark Score
1,052
1,046
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
720+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
1.008 TFLOPS+46%
Boost Clock
900 MHz
900 MHz
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
36+50%
L1 Cache
96 KB+33%
72 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W4170MRadeon HD 6750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4170M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6750 carries 1 GB. FirePro W4170M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4170M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6750.

FeatureFirePro W4170MRadeon HD 6750
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+300%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (FirePro W4170M) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W4170MRadeon HD 6750
DirectX
12 (11_1)+7%
11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W4170M) vs None (Radeon HD 6750). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W4170M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750).

FeatureFirePro W4170MRadeon HD 6750
Encoder
VCE 1.0
None
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4170M draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6750's 86W — a 54.2% difference. The Radeon HD 6750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4170M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.

FeatureFirePro W4170MRadeon HD 6750
TDP
150W
86W-43%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
170mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75
75
Perf/Watt
7.0
12.2+74%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is FirePro W4170M (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro W4170MRadeon HD 6750
MSRP
$109
Codename
Opal
Juniper
Release
April 23 2015
January 21 2011
Ranking
#868
#872

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.