FirePro W4170M vs RadeonT 610M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W4170M is positioned at rank 56 and the RadeonT 610M is on rank 232, so the FirePro W4170M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4170M

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

95%

#27

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

MSRP: $500|Avg: $280

95%

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

89%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

88%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

87%

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

84%

#41

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

562%

#56

FirePro W4170M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#58

Quadro K2000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

95%

#60

Intel Arc Pro A60

MSRP: $380|Avg: $380

95%

#63

T400 4GB

MSRP: $159|Avg: $99

91%

#64

Radeon Pro 5300

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

90%

#69

Radeon Pro W5500

MSRP: $399|Avg: $300

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 610M

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

99%

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

91%

#222

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

498%

#224

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

451%

#225

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

450%

#229

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

409%

#230

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

407%

#232

RadeonT 610M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#235

Radeon RX 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

99%

#236

Radeon HD 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

98%

#237

Radeon HD 7570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15

97%

#239

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

95%

#240

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

95%

#242

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RadeonT 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The RadeonT 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W4170M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RadeonT 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W4170M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	FirePro W4170M	RadeonT 610M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RadeonT 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W4170M Benchmark Check

RadeonT 610M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W4170M and RadeonT 610M

FirePro W4170M

The FirePro W4170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

RadeonT 610M

The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4170M scores 1,052 and the RadeonT 610M reaches 1,068 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4170M is built on GCN 1.0 while the RadeonT 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro W4170M) vs 128 (RadeonT 610M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro W4170M) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	FirePro W4170M	RadeonT 610M
G3D Mark Score	1,052	1,068+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384+200%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS+23%	0.5632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	900 MHz	2200 MHz+144%
ROPs	8+100%	4
TMUs	24+200%	8
L1 Cache	96 KB+200%	32 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W4170M	RadeonT 610M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4170M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 610M has 512 MB. The FirePro W4170M offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4170M) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W4170M	RadeonT 610M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (FirePro W4170M) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 610M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro W4170M	RadeonT 610M
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W4170M) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 610M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W4170M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 610M).

Feature	FirePro W4170M	RadeonT 610M
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	UVD 4.0	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4170M draws 150W versus the RadeonT 610M's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4170M) vs 350W (RadeonT 610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.