GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 M460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 M460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 M460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920MX

2016

Why buy it

✅27.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 148.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 16W instead of 75W, a 59W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M460

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 920MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
150% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌368.8% higher power demand at 75W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 920MX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M460 instead at 1,069 vs 1,064, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 920MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 920MX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 148.8% (10.6 vs 4.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 M460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

Radeon R7 M460

The Radeon R7 M460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,069 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 and the Radeon R7 M460 reaches 1,069 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920MX is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 M460 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920MX) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M460). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M460). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 M460
G3D Mark Score	1,064	1,069
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	0.864 TFLOPS+70%
Boost Clock	993 MHz	1125 MHz+13%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 M460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920MX and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M460. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R7 M460) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 M460
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the Radeon R7 M460's 75W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 M460
TDP	16W-79%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	66.5+365%	14.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 920MX came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M460 launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce 920MX was 60% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (GeForce 920MX) vs 4.3 (Radeon R7 M460) — the GeForce 920MX offers 146.5% better value.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 M460
MSRP	$100-60%	$250
Performance per Dollar	10.6+147%	4.3
Codename	GM108	Meso
Release	March 25 2016	May 15 2016
Ranking	#864	#861

Search GeForce 920MX on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.