CPU
GPU
GeForce 920MX
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 920MX is positioned at rank 360 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is on rank 603, so the GeForce 920MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 920MX is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The GeForce 920MX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 920MX.
| Insight | GeForce 920MX | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $54), it costs 7% less, resulting in a 10.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 920MX | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($54) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920MX and Mobility Radeon HD 5870
GeForce 920MX
The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,088 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 reaches 1,088 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920MX is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920MX) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5870). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5870).
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,064 | 1,088+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 800+213% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+120% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 920MX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 has 1 GB. The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 5870) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 920MX) vs 11 (5.0) (Mobility Radeon HD 5870). Vulkan: 1.1 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11 (5.0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 920MX) vs None (Mobility Radeon HD 5870). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 920MX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 5870).
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 5870's 50W — a 103% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5870). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-68% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 66.5+205% | 21.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 920MX launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $54, while the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 launched at $399 and now averages $50. The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 costs 7.4% less ($4 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) vs 21.8 (Mobility Radeon HD 5870) — the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 offers 10.7% better value. The GeForce 920MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-75% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $54 | $50-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.7 | 21.8+11% |
| Codename | GM108 | Broadway |
| Release | March 25 2016 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #864 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 920MX and Mobility Radeon HD 5870
