GeForce 920MX vs Radeon R7 M350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 920MX is positioned at rank 360 and the Radeon R7 M350 is on rank 359, so the Radeon R7 M350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX

#350

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1020%

#352

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

925%

#353

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

923%

#357

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

839%

#358

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

833%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

100%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

100%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

99%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

95%

#369

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

94%

#370

GeForce GT 730A

MSRP: $75|Avg: $20

93%

#372

Radeon HD 7660G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

90%

#373

Radeon R7 M270DX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

90%

#374

Radeon HD 6670/7670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

90%

#375

Radeon 620

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M350

#349

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1018%

#351

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

923%

#352

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

921%

#356

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

837%

#357

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

832%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

100%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

100%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

100%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

98%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

95%

#369

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

94%

#370

GeForce GT 730A

MSRP: $75|Avg: $20

93%

#372

Radeon R7 M270DX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

90%

#373

Radeon HD 7660G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

90%

#374

Radeon HD 6670/7670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 M350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 920MX.

Insight	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 M350
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 920MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 920MX holds the technical lead. Priced at $54 (vs $100), it costs 46% less, resulting in a 84.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 M350
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+84.8%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($54)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 920MX Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 M350 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920MX and Radeon R7 M350

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

Radeon R7 M350

The Radeon R7 M350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,066 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 and the Radeon R7 M350 reaches 1,066 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920MX is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 M350 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920MX) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M350). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.7795 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M350). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 M350
G3D Mark Score	1,064	1,066
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	0.7795 TFLOPS+53%
Boost Clock	993 MHz+20%	825 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 M350
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R7 M350) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 M350
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the Radeon R7 M350's 35W — a 74.5% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Radeon R7 M350
TDP	16W-54%	35W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	66.5+118%	30.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 920MX launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $54, while the Radeon R7 M350 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The GeForce 920MX costs 46% less ($46 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) vs 10.7 (Radeon R7 M350) — the GeForce 920MX offers 84.1% better value. The GeForce 920MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).