
GeForce 920MX

Quadro K1100M
GeForce 920MX vs Quadro K1100M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 920MX vs Quadro K1100M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 920MX vs Quadro K1100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 920MX
2016Why buy it
- ✅40.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 16W instead of 45W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro K1100M
2013Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 920MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌181.3% higher power demand at 45W vs 16W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 920MX vs Quadro K1100M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920MX
The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

Quadro K1100M
The Quadro K1100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $109.94.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 and the Quadro K1100M reaches 1,089 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920MX is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K1100M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920MX) vs 384 (Quadro K1100M). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro K1100M).
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Quadro K1100M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,064 | 1,089+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 0.5422 TFLOPS+7% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 920MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K1100M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Quadro K1100M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 920MX has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1100M carries 2 GB. Quadro K1100M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920MX and 64-bit on the Quadro K1100M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro K1100M) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Quadro K1100M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 920MX) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K1100M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Quadro K1100M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 920MX) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Quadro K1100M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 920MX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K1100M).
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Quadro K1100M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the Quadro K1100M's 45W — a 95.1% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 350W (Quadro K1100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Quadro K1100M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-64% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 66.5+175% | 24.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 920MX (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 920MX | Quadro K1100M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Codename | GM108 | GK107 |
| Release | March 25 2016 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #864 | #856 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















