
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is positioned at rank #465 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | Gen. 11 (2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Gen. 11 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 4W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU scores 1,072 and the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,072 | 1,100+3% |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 10 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU draws 7W versus the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)'s 4W — a 54.5% difference. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 1W (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W | 4W-43% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.1 | 275.0+80% |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) costs 100+% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.7 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) — the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | — | Gen. 11 |
| Release | December 6 2018 | January 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #860 | #918 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















