Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 M460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 M460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 M460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 7W instead of 75W, a 68W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M460

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 M460 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
25% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌971.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (1,072 vs 1,069), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 M460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 25.4% (5.4 vs 4.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 M460 has the stronger long-term case.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 M460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.

Radeon R7 M460

The Radeon R7 M460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,069 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU scores 1,072 and the Radeon R7 M460 reaches 1,069 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon R7 M460
G3D Mark Score	1,072	1,069
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon R7 M460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M460 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 M460 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M460.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon R7 M460
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon R7 M460's 75W — a 165.9% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M460). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon R7 M460
TDP	7W-91%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	Mobile
Perf/Watt	153.1+971%	14.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 M460 launched at $250. On MSRP, Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU was 20% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 4.3 (Radeon R7 M460) — the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU offers 25.6% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU (2018 vs 2016).

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon R7 M460
MSRP	$200-20%	$250
Performance per Dollar	5.4+26%	4.3
Codename	—	Meso
Release	December 6 2018	May 15 2016
Ranking	#860	#861

Search Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.