Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 M350
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is positioned at rank 465 and the Radeon R7 M350 is on rank 359, so the Radeon R7 M350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 M350 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M350 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $100 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 0.6% better value per dollar than the Radeon R7 M350.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU and Radeon R7 M350
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.
Radeon R7 M350
The Radeon R7 M350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,066 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU scores 1,072 and the Radeon R7 M350 reaches 1,066 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,072 | 1,066 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M350 has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 M350 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon R7 M350's 35W — a 133.3% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M350). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-80% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 153.1+402% | 30.5 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon R7 M350 launched at $100 and now averages $100. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.7 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 10.7 (Radeon R7 M350) — the Radeon R7 M350 offers 0% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $100-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Codename | — | Meso |
| Release | December 6 2018 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #860 | #862 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU and Radeon R7 M350
