
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

Radeon R7 M350
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 M350 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 M350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 M350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 35W, a 28W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Radeon R7 M350
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 M350 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 35W vs 7W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 M350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.

Radeon R7 M350
The Radeon R7 M350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,066 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU scores 1,072 and the Radeon R7 M350 reaches 1,066 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,072 | 1,066 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M350 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 M350 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M350.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon R7 M350's 35W — a 133.3% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M350). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-80% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 153.1+402% | 30.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 M350 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M350 was 50% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 10.7 (Radeon R7 M350) — the Radeon R7 M350 offers 98.1% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $100-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 10.7+98% |
| Codename | — | Meso |
| Release | December 6 2018 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #860 | #862 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















