Radeon 625 vs Radeon R7 M350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 625 is positioned at rank 357 and the Radeon R7 M350 is on rank 359, so the Radeon 625 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 625

#347

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1008%

#349

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

914%

#350

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

911%

#354

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

829%

#355

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

823%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

99%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

99%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

97%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

94%

#369

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

93%

#370

GeForce GT 730A

MSRP: $75|Avg: $20

92%

#372

Radeon HD 7660G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M350

#349

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1018%

#351

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

923%

#352

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

921%

#356

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

837%

#357

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

832%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

100%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

100%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

100%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

98%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

95%

#369

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

94%

#370

GeForce GT 730A

MSRP: $75|Avg: $20

93%

#372

Radeon R7 M270DX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

90%

#373

Radeon HD 7660G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

90%

#374

Radeon HD 6670/7670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 625 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 625 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 M350 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 625 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M350.

Insight	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 M350
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon 625 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $100 for the Radeon R7 M350, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 102.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 M350
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+102.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($50)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 625 Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 M350 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 625 and Radeon R7 M350

Radeon 625

The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

Radeon R7 M350

The Radeon R7 M350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,066 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 625 scores 1,077 and the Radeon R7 M350 reaches 1,066 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 625 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R7 M350 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 625) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M350). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625) vs 0.7795 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M350). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 M350
G3D Mark Score	1,077+1%	1,066
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	0.7795 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1024 MHz+24%	825 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 M350
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 M350
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 625 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M350's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon R7 M350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 625) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 M350
TDP	50W	35W-30%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	21.5	30.5+42%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 625 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R7 M350 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The Radeon 625 costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.5 (Radeon 625) vs 10.7 (Radeon R7 M350) — the Radeon 625 offers 100.9% better value. The Radeon 625 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).