
Radeon 625 vs GeForce RTX 2060

Radeon 625
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 625 is positioned at rank #357 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 625
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1210.5% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 625.
| Insight | Radeon 625 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1210.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1210.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 446% better value per dollar than the Radeon 625.
| Insight | Radeon 625 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+446%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 625 and GeForce RTX 2060

Radeon 625
The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 625 scores 1,077 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 1210.5%. The Radeon 625 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 625) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 625 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,077 | 14,114+1210% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1920+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+720% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 1680 MHz+64% |
| ROPs | 8 | 48+500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 120+400% |
| L1 Cache | 0.09 MB | 1.9 MB+2011% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 3 MB+2208% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 625 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 625 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon 625) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 625 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 3 MB+2208% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 625 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon 625 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 625) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 625 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-69% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 113mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 21.5 | 88.2+310% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 625 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The Radeon 625 costs 58.3% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.5 (Radeon 625) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 447% better value.
| Feature | Radeon 625 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-71% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-58% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5 | 117.6+447% |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | TU106 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #858 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












