Radeon 6600M vs GRID K180Q
Radeon 6600M
Popular choices:
GRID K180Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 6600M is positioned at rank 587 and the GRID K180Q is on rank 381, so the GRID K180Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6600M
Performance Per Dollar GRID K180Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 6600M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Radeon 6600M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID K180Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 6600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K180Q.
| Insight | Radeon 6600M | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 6600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 6600M and GRID K180Q
Radeon 6600M
The Radeon 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 536 points.
GRID K180Q
The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 6600M scores 536 and the GRID K180Q reaches 534 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GRID K180Q uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 6600M) vs 1,536 (GRID K180Q). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 6600M) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q).
| Feature | Radeon 6600M | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 536 | 534 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.459 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+57% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 6600M | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 6600M) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K180Q) — the Radeon 6600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 6600M | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 6600M draws 40W versus the GRID K180Q's 225W — a 139.6% difference. The Radeon 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6600M) vs 350W (GRID K180Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 6600M | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-82% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 13.4+458% | 2.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 6600M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon 6600M | GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1000 |
| Codename | Rembrandt+ | GK104 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #565 | #595 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 6600M and GRID K180Q
