Radeon 6600M vs Quadro FX 2700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 6600M is positioned at rank 587 and the Quadro FX 2700 is on rank 203, so the Quadro FX 2700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6600M

#577

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

3643%

#579

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3303%

#580

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3294%

#584

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

2995%

#585

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

2975%

#587

Radeon 6600M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#588

Mobility Radeon HD 4350

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

99%

#589

GeForce 405

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

99%

#590

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

MSRP: $79|Avg: $15

99%

#591

Mobility Radeon HD 5650

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

99%

#592

GeForce 510

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

98%

#593

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

96%

#594

GeForce 9300M G

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

95%

#596

GeForce 9800 GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $20

94%

#598

GeForce 9100M G

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

93%

#599

Mobility Radeon X1900

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

93%

#600

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

93%

#601

GeForce 210

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

93%

#602

Radeon R7 M365X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2700

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

99%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

98%

#90

Quadro P5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

94%

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

92%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

90%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

90%

#188

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2721%

#203

Quadro FX 2700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#206

FirePro V3900

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

98%

#207

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

MSRP: $119|Avg: $89

97%

#208

Tesla K8

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

94%

#210

GRID K240Q

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

94%

#211

FirePro M4150

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

93%

#212

FirePro V4900

MSRP: $200|Avg: $47

93%

#213

GRID K160Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $30

92%

#215

Quadro

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

92%

#216

FirePro W5000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 6600M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The Radeon 6600M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 2700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 2700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 6600M.

Insight	Radeon 6600M	Quadro FX 2700
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 2700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 6600M Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 2700 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 6600M and Quadro FX 2700

Radeon 6600M

The Radeon 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 536 points.

Quadro FX 2700

The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 6600M scores 536 and the Quadro FX 2700 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro FX 2700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 6600M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 6600M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700).

Feature	Radeon 6600M	Quadro FX 2700
G3D Mark Score	536	543+1%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.459 TFLOPS+135%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 6600M	Quadro FX 2700
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 6600M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 2700 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 6600M) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 2700) — the Radeon 6600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 6600M	Quadro FX 2700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 6600M draws 40W versus the Quadro FX 2700's 189W — a 130.1% difference. The Radeon 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6600M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.