Radeon 680M
VS
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Radeon 680M vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

AMD

Radeon 680M

2023Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1755 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 680M is positioned at rank #331 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 680M

#321
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
849%
#323
770%
#324
767%
#328
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
698%
#329
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
693%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
100%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
100%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
97%
#335
GeForce 710A
MSRP: $35|Avg: $62
97%
#336
96%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
95%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
94%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
93%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
106%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
102%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
101%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
101%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
101%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
100%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
99%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
98%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
97%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
97%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
96%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
94%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
94%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
94%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
93%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
92%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
91%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
91%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
90%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 210% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 680M.

InsightRadeon 680MGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-210%)
Leading raw performance (+210%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $80), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 65.3% better value per dollar than the Radeon 680M.

InsightRadeon 680MGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+65.3%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($80)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 680M and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

AMD

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 680M scores 3,836 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 210%. The Radeon 680M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 680M) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon 680M) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 80.

FeatureRadeon 680MGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
G3D Mark Score
3,836
11,892+210%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Ampere
Process Node
6 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
768
2560+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
8.986 TFLOPS+166%
Boost Clock
2200 MHz+25%
1755 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
80+67%
L1 Cache
0.25 MB
2.5 MB+900%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
12
20+67%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 680MGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 680M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon 680MGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
8 GB+300%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
224 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon 680M) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon 680MGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
DirectX
12_2
12.2+2%
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: VCN 3.1 vs 5th Gen NVDEC.

FeatureRadeon 680MGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Encoder
VCN 3.1
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
VCN 3.1
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 680M draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 680M) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon 680MGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
TDP
50W-62%
130W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
1mm
235mm
Height
124mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
76.7
91.5+19%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 680M costs 46.7% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.0 (Radeon 680M) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 65.2% better value. The Radeon 680M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).

FeatureRadeon 680MGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$80-47%
$150
Performance per Dollar
48.0
79.3+65%
Codename
Rembrandt+
GA106
Release
January 3 2023
January 4 2022
Ranking
#512
#224