Radeon 780M
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

Radeon 780M vs GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

AMD

Radeon 780M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

2020Core: 1380 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 780M is positioned at rank 296 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is on rank 12, so the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 780M

#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
98%
#286
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
707%
#288
641%
#289
639%
#293
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
581%
#294
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
578%
#296
Radeon 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#297
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
100%
#300
GeForce 940MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#301
GeForce MX130
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
98%
#302
Arc Graphics 130V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
98%
#303
Radeon R5 430
MSRP: $59|Avg: $50
98%
#304
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
98%
#307
GeForce MX450
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
97%
#308
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
96%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
117%
#8
106%
#9
106%
#12
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
96%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
95%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 780M.

InsightRadeon 780MGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 780M and GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

AMD

Radeon 780M

The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 15 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1380 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 780M scores 6,906 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) reaches 6,968 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 780M) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M) vs 3.195 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 780MGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
6,906
6,968
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Turing
Process Node
4 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
768
1024+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.909 TFLOPS+179%
3.195 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+86%
1560 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
64+33%
L1 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 780MGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 780M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) — the Radeon 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 780MGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
128 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 780M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon 780MGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)).

FeatureRadeon 780MGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
Encoder
VCN 4.0
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
VCN 4.0
NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 780M draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)'s 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 780M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 780MGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
TDP
15W-70%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
460.4+230%
139.4