
Radeon 8050S vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon 8050S
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 8050S
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 8050S is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Radeon 8050S likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 8050S is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 106.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1650 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 8050S | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+106.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-106.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.5 / 4nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $400 for the Radeon 8050S, it costs 81% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 158.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 8050S | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+158.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8050S and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon 8050S
The Radeon 8050S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,259 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 8050S scores 16,259 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Radeon 8050S leads by 106.6%. The Radeon 8050S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon 8050S) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon 8050S) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,259+107% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+129% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.47 TFLOPS+284% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz+68% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+129% | 56 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 8050S comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (Max) (Radeon 8050S) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon 8050S. Bus width: System Shared vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8050S) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon 8050S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | none | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X (Shared) | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s (Max)+100% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System Shared | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8050S) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8050S) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8050S) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8050S draws 55W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon 8050S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon 8050S) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-27% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 295.6+182% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8050S launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 81.3% less ($325 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.6 (Radeon 8050S) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 158.4% better value. The Radeon 8050S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $149-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $75-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.6 | 104.9+158% |
| Codename | Strix Halo | TU117 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #126 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.










