Radeon 890M vs Radeon PRO W6400

AMD

Radeon 890M

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

2022Core: 2331 MHzBoost: 2331 MHz

Radeon 890M vs Radeon PRO W6400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 890M vs Radeon PRO W6400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 890M vs Radeon PRO W6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 890M

2024

Why buy it

  • 8.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon 890M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Radeon 890M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 890M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO W6400 instead at 8,428 vs 8,175, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 890M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 6nm, 16 vs 12 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon PRO W6400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 890M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 890M vs Radeon PRO W6400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 890M

The Radeon 890M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,175 points.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 890M scores 8,175 and the Radeon PRO W6400 reaches 8,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 890M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 890M) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon 890M) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2331 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon 890M) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6400).

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon PRO W6400
G3D Mark Score
8,175
8,428+3%
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
4 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1024+33%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS+66%
3.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+24%
2331 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64+33%
48
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + RSR
Ray Tracing Cores
16+33%
12

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon PRO W6400
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 890M and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 890M) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the Radeon 890M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon PRO W6400
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
System
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 890M) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon PRO W6400
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon 890M) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon 890M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon PRO W6400
Encoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 3.0
Decoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 890M draws 15W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon 890M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 890M) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon PRO W6400
TDP
15W-70%
50W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
545.0+223%
168.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 890M (2024 vs 2022).

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon PRO W6400
MSRP
$229
Codename
Strix Point
Navi 24
Release
July 15 2024
January 19 2022
Ranking
#312
#308

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.