
Radeon 890M

Radeon PRO W6400
Radeon 890M vs Radeon PRO W6400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 890M vs Radeon PRO W6400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon 890M vs Radeon PRO W6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 890M
2024Why buy it
- ✅8.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 890M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Radeon 890M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 890M vs Radeon PRO W6400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 890M
The Radeon 890M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,175 points.

Radeon PRO W6400
The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 890M scores 8,175 and the Radeon PRO W6400 reaches 8,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 890M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 890M) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon 890M) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2331 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon 890M) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6400).
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,175 | 8,428+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+33% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+66% | 3.58 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+24% | 2331 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+33% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 890M and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 890M) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the Radeon 890M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 890M) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon 890M) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon 890M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 890M draws 15W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon 890M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 890M) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 545.0+223% | 168.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 890M (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $229 |
| Codename | Strix Point | Navi 24 |
| Release | July 15 2024 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #312 | #308 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















