
Radeon 890M

Radeon R9 290 / 390
Radeon 890M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 890M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon 890M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 890M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 290 / 390 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Radeon R9 290 / 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅18.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 890M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 890M
The Radeon 890M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,175 points.

Radeon R9 290 / 390
The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,150 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 890M scores 8,175 and the Radeon R9 290 / 390 reaches 8,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 890M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 890M) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon 890M) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,175 | 8,150 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2560+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+16% | 5.12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+190% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 160+150% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 890M and 512-bit on the Radeon R9 290 / 390. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 890M) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon 890M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 512-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 890M) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon 890M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon 890M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290 / 390).
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 890M draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 290 / 390's 300W — a 181% difference. The Radeon 890M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 890M) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 275mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 275mm |
| Height | 0mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 545.0+1904% | 27.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 890M (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $329 |
| Codename | Strix Point | Grenada |
| Release | July 15 2024 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #312 | #296 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















