Radeon 890M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390

AMD

Radeon 890M

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

2015Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 890M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 890M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 890M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 890M

2024

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 290 / 390 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Radeon R9 290 / 390

2015

Why buy it

  • 18.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 290 / 390 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 890M instead at 8,175 vs 8,150, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 890M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 290 / 390 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 290 / 390 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 890M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 890M vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 890M

The Radeon 890M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,175 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,150 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 890M scores 8,175 and the Radeon R9 290 / 390 reaches 8,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 890M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 890M) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon 890M) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon R9 290 / 390
G3D Mark Score
8,175
8,150
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
GCN 2.0
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
2560+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS+16%
5.12 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+190%
1000 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
64
160+150%
L1 Cache
256 KB
640 KB+150%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon R9 290 / 390
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 890M and 512-bit on the Radeon R9 290 / 390. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 890M) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon 890M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon R9 290 / 390
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
320 GB/s
Bus Width
System
512-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 890M) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon R9 290 / 390
DirectX
12.2+2%
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon 890M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon 890M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290 / 390).

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon R9 290 / 390
Encoder
VCN 3.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
VCN 3.0
UVD 4.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 890M draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 290 / 390's 300W — a 181% difference. The Radeon 890M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 890M) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 275mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon R9 290 / 390
TDP
15W-95%
300W
Recommended PSU
500W-33%
750W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
0mm
275mm
Height
0mm
109mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
95°C
Perf/Watt
545.0+1904%
27.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 890M (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon 890MRadeon R9 290 / 390
MSRP
$329
Codename
Strix Point
Grenada
Release
July 15 2024
June 18 2015
Ranking
#312
#296

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.