RADEON 9550 vs Radeon X1200

AMD

RADEON 9550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1200

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

RADEON 9550 vs Radeon X1200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9550 vs Radeon X1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9550

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 61.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Radeon X1200

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Delivers 52% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • RADEON 9550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9550 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6.1% in PassMark G3D (35 vs 33), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 52% (0.4 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. RADEON 9550 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

RADEON 9550 vs Radeon X1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RADEON 9550

The RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon X1200

The Radeon X1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9550 scores 35 versus the Radeon X1200's 33 — the RADEON 9550 leads by 6.1%. The RADEON 9550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon X1200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON 9550) vs 384 (Radeon X1200). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 9550) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1200). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureRADEON 9550Radeon X1200
G3D Mark Score
35+6%
33
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.211 TFLOPS+54%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1183 MHz+16%
1024 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 9550Radeon X1200
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9550 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1200 carries 512 MB. Radeon X1200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9550 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1200. L2 Cache: 256 KB (RADEON 9550) vs 128 KB (Radeon X1200) — the RADEON 9550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON 9550Radeon X1200
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9550 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1200's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon X1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9550) vs 350W (Radeon X1200). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRADEON 9550Radeon X1200
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
0.7
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 9550 came in at $129, while the Radeon X1200 launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon X1200 was 38% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (RADEON 9550) vs 0.4 (Radeon X1200) — the Radeon X1200 offers 33.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1200 (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureRADEON 9550Radeon X1200
MSRP
$129
$80-38%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
0.4+33%
Codename
Lexa
Polaris 24
Release
April 20 2017
May 13 2019
Ranking
#668
#898

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.