
RADEON 9600 XT
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON 9600 XT is positioned at rank #370 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9600 XT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9600 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra.
| Insight | RADEON 9600 XT | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON 9600 XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9600 XT and GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

RADEON 9600 XT
The RADEON 9600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $899.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON 9600 XT scores 35 and the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra reaches 34 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON 9600 XT is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra uses Rankine, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,376 (RADEON 9600 XT) vs 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Raw compute: 51.48 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600 XT) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Boost clocks: 2394 MHz vs 1155 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (RADEON 9600 XT) vs 16 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 64.
| Feature | RADEON 9600 XT | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35+3% | 34 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5376+163% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 51.48 TFLOPS+988% | 4.731 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2394 MHz+107% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+380% | 40 |
| TMUs | 336+425% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+425% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9600 XT | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (RADEON 9600 XT) vs 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) — the RADEON 9600 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9600 XT | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9600 XT draws 300W versus the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra's 25W — a 169.2% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9600 XT) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9600 XT | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 25W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 1.4+1300% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9600 XT launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (RADEON 9600 XT) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | RADEON 9600 XT | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | Navi 31 | GA107 |
| Release | November 3 2022 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #21 | #387 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















