
RADEON 9600SE vs GeForce Go 6400

RADEON 9600SE
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 6400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9600SE is positioned at rank 723 and the GeForce Go 6400 is on rank 338, so the GeForce Go 6400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9600SE
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9600SE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2012). The RADEON 9600SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 6400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9600SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.5% higher G3D Mark score and 3025% more VRAM (512 MB vs 16 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 6400.
| Insight | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+12.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-12.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+3025%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON 9600SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9600SE and GeForce Go 6400

RADEON 9600SE
The RADEON 9600SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.

GeForce Go 6400
The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9600SE scores 27 versus the GeForce Go 6400's 24 — the RADEON 9600SE leads by 12.5%. The RADEON 9600SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce Go 6400 uses Kepler, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9600SE) vs 384 (GeForce Go 6400). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600SE) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400).
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27+13% | 24 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+567% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS+2044% | 0.6927 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 160+400% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+3100% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9600SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6400 has 16 MB. The RADEON 9600SE offers 3025% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9600SE) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 6400) — the RADEON 9600SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+3025% | 0.016 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+3100% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0 (RADEON 9600SE) vs 10.0 (GeForce Go 6400). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0 | 10.0+11% |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1+5% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9600SE) vs No (GeForce Go 6400). Decoder: None vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 9600SE) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6400).
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9600SE draws 55W versus the GeForce Go 6400's 65W — a 16.7% difference. The RADEON 9600SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9600SE) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6400). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 75°C.
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-15% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60-20% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+25% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9600SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2012).
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $65 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65 | — |
| Codename | Strix Halo | GK107 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | June 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #98 | #837 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















