
RADEON 9600SE vs GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

RADEON 9600SE
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON 9600SE is positioned at rank #723 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9600SE
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON 9600SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+25.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9600SE and GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

RADEON 9600SE
The RADEON 9600SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9600SE scores 27 versus the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra's 34 — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra leads by 25.9%. The RADEON 9600SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra uses Rankine, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9600SE) vs 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600SE) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1155 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RADEON 9600SE) vs 16 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 64.
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27 | 34+26% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS+214% | 4.731 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+151% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+150% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9600SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has 256 MB. The RADEON 9600SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9600SE) vs 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) — the RADEON 9600SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0 (RADEON 9600SE) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0 | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9600SE) vs Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Decoder: None vs Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 9600SE) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra).
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Integrated Decoder ONLY |
| Decoder | None | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9600SE draws 55W versus the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra's 25W — a 75% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9600SE) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 75°C.
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 25W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60-20% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 1.4+180% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9600SE launched at $65 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra costs 100+% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.4 (RADEON 9600SE) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The RADEON 9600SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $65 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | Strix Halo | GA107 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #98 | #387 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















