
RADEON A9800XT vs MOBILITY RADEON 9550

RADEON A9800XT
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 30.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON A9800XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON A9800XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-30.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+30.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 291.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON A9800XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+291.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON A9800XT and MOBILITY RADEON 9550

RADEON A9800XT
The RADEON A9800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points. Launch price was $229.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON A9800XT scores 23 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 30 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 leads by 30.4%. The RADEON A9800XT is built on GCN 3.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON A9800XT) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 3.973 TFLOPS (RADEON A9800XT) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550).
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23 | 30+30% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+156% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.973 TFLOPS+255% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+540% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON A9800XT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 has 65 MB. The RADEON A9800XT offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON A9800XT) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) — the RADEON A9800XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0 (RADEON A9800XT) vs 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0 | 9.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON A9800XT draws 250W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON A9800XT) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 220mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 50W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 220mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.6+500% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON A9800XT launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 launched at $100 and now averages $10. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.8 (RADEON A9800XT) vs 3.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 offers 275% better value. The RADEON A9800XT is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $10-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 3.0+275% |
| Codename | Antigua | Broadway |
| Release | November 19 2015 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #394 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















