
RADEON A9800XT vs RADEON 9600SE

RADEON A9800XT
Popular choices:

RADEON 9600SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9600SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9600SE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The RADEON 9600SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON A9800XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9600SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 17.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON A9800XT.
| Insight | RADEON A9800XT | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-17.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+17.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON A9800XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $65 for the RADEON 9600SE, it costs 54% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 84.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON A9800XT | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+84.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON A9800XT and RADEON 9600SE

RADEON A9800XT
The RADEON A9800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points. Launch price was $229.

RADEON 9600SE
The RADEON 9600SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON A9800XT scores 23 versus the RADEON 9600SE's 27 — the RADEON 9600SE leads by 17.4%. The RADEON A9800XT is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON 9600SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON A9800XT) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9600SE). Raw compute: 3.973 TFLOPS (RADEON A9800XT) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600SE). Boost clocks: 970 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23 | 27+17% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.973 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+274% |
| Boost Clock | 970 MHz | 2900 MHz+199% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (RADEON A9800XT) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9600SE) — the RADEON 9600SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0 (RADEON A9800XT) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9600SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0 | 9.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON A9800XT draws 250W versus the RADEON 9600SE's 55W — a 127.9% difference. The RADEON 9600SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON A9800XT) vs 350W (RADEON 9600SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 220mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 55W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 220mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.5+400% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON A9800XT launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the RADEON 9600SE launched at $65 and now averages $65. The RADEON A9800XT costs 53.8% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.8 (RADEON A9800XT) vs 0.4 (RADEON 9600SE) — the RADEON A9800XT offers 100% better value. The RADEON 9600SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | RADEON A9800XT | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $65 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-54% | $65 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8+100% | 0.4 |
| Codename | Antigua | Strix Halo |
| Release | November 19 2015 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #394 | #98 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















