GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RADEON 9600SE
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
RADEON 9600SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9600SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 116855.6% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9600SE.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+116855.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-116855.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $65), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 12784.9% better value per dollar than the RADEON 9600SE.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+12784.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RADEON 9600SE
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
RADEON 9600SE
The RADEON 9600SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RADEON 9600SE's 27 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 116855.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RADEON 9600SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9600SE). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600SE). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 40 (RADEON 9600SE) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+116856% | 27 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+200% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+170% | 14.85 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz | 2900 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+50% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+500% | 8 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+50% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RADEON 9600SE lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RADEON 9600SE relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9600SE has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9600SE) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+500% | 8 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9600SE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+33% | 9.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+130% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs None (RADEON 9600SE). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs None. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9600SE).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | None |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RADEON 9600SE's 55W — a 135.3% difference. The RADEON 9600SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (RADEON 9600SE). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 285mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 55W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 285mm | 168mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 60-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+22060% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the RADEON 9600SE launched at $65 and now averages $65. The RADEON 9600SE costs 89% less ($525 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.4 (RADEON 9600SE) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 13275% better value. The RADEON 9600SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $65-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $65-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+13275% | 0.4 |
| Codename | AD104 | Strix Halo |
| Release | January 3 2023 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #11 | #98 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RADEON 9600SE
