CPU
GPU
RADEON E4690
Popular choices:
GeForce 810M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON E4690 is positioned at rank 713 and the GeForce 810M is on rank 317, so the GeForce 810M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E4690
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 810M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 810M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON E4690.
| Insight | RADEON E4690 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 810M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON E4690 and GeForce 810M
RADEON E4690
The RADEON E4690 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 405 points.
GeForce 810M
The GeForce 810M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 420 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON E4690 scores 405 and the GeForce 810M reaches 420 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON E4690 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce 810M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON E4690) vs 384 (GeForce 810M). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON E4690) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 810M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 405 | 420+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+375% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1124 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+700% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (RADEON E4690) vs 1 MB (GeForce 810M) — the GeForce 810M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON E4690 draws 95W versus the GeForce 810M's 33W — a 96.9% difference. The GeForce 810M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E4690) vs 350W (GeForce 810M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W | 33W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3 | 12.7+195% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON E4690 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $558 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $558 | — |
| Codename | Amethyst | GM108 |
| Release | September 29 2015 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #420 | #854 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON E4690 and GeForce 810M
