RADEON E4690 vs Radeon R5 M230

AMD

RADEON E4690

2015Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M230

2015
Similar parts
·······

RADEON E4690 vs Radeon R5 M230 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON E4690 vs Radeon R5 M230 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON E4690 vs Radeon R5 M230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON E4690

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 597.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $558 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($558 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Radeon R5 M230

2015

Why buy it

  • 7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $478 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $558 MSRP).
  • Delivers 631.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $558 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 95W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 M230 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.9% in PassMark G3D (425 vs 405), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON E4690 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 M230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $478 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $558, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 631.9% (5.3 vs 0.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M230 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON E4690 has the stronger long-term case.

RADEON E4690 vs Radeon R5 M230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RADEON E4690

The RADEON E4690 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 405 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 M230

The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.

Graphics Performance

The RADEON E4690 scores 405 and the Radeon R5 M230 reaches 425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON E4690 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R5 M230 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON E4690) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230).

FeatureRADEON E4690Radeon R5 M230
G3D Mark Score
405
425+5%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+100%
1024

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON E4690Radeon R5 M230
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON E4690 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M230 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M230 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON E4690 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M230.

FeatureRADEON E4690Radeon R5 M230
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON E4690 draws 95W versus the Radeon R5 M230's 75W — a 23.5% difference. The Radeon R5 M230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E4690) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M230). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.

FeatureRADEON E4690Radeon R5 M230
TDP
95W
75W-21%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Mobile
Perf/Watt
4.3
5.7+33%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON E4690 came in at $558, while the Radeon R5 M230 launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M230 was 85.7% cheaper ($478 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (RADEON E4690) vs 5.3 (Radeon R5 M230) — the Radeon R5 M230 offers 657.1% better value.

FeatureRADEON E4690Radeon R5 M230
MSRP
$558
$80-86%
Performance per Dollar
0.7
5.3+657%
Codename
Amethyst
Pitcairn
Release
September 29 2015
June 9 2015
Ranking
#420
#522

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.