
RADEON E4690

Radeon R5 M230
RADEON E4690 vs Radeon R5 M230 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON E4690 vs Radeon R5 M230 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON E4690 vs Radeon R5 M230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON E4690
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌597.5% HIGHER MSRP$558 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($558 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Radeon R5 M230
2015Why buy it
- ✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $478 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $558 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 631.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $558 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 95W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON E4690 vs Radeon R5 M230 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON E4690
The RADEON E4690 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 405 points.

Radeon R5 M230
The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON E4690 scores 405 and the Radeon R5 M230 reaches 425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON E4690 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R5 M230 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON E4690) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230).
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 405 | 425+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON E4690 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M230 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M230 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON E4690 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M230.
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON E4690 draws 95W versus the Radeon R5 M230's 75W — a 23.5% difference. The Radeon R5 M230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E4690) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M230). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W | 75W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3 | 5.7+33% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RADEON E4690 came in at $558, while the Radeon R5 M230 launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M230 was 85.7% cheaper ($478 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (RADEON E4690) vs 5.3 (Radeon R5 M230) — the Radeon R5 M230 offers 657.1% better value.
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $558 | $80-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.7 | 5.3+657% |
| Codename | Amethyst | Pitcairn |
| Release | September 29 2015 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #420 | #522 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














