GeForce 8800 GTS vs RADEON E4690

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800 GTS

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON E4690

2015Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 8800 GTS vs RADEON E4690 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8800 GTS vs RADEON E4690 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8800 GTS vs RADEON E4690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8800 GTS

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $109 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $558 MSRP).
  • Delivers 24.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $558 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RADEON E4690 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 321 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 321 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 57.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 95W.

RADEON E4690

2015

Why buy it

  • 3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 59.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 321 MB).
  • Draws 95W instead of 150W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 24.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $558 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($558 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON E4690 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 8800 GTS instead at 407 vs 405, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 8800 GTS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8800 GTS makes the most sense to buy today. It is $109 cheaper on MSRP at $449 vs $558, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 24.9% (0.9 vs 0.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. RADEON E4690 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 8800 GTS vs RADEON E4690 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800 GTS

The GeForce 8800 GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 407 points.

AMD

RADEON E4690

The RADEON E4690 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 405 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8800 GTS scores 407 and the RADEON E4690 reaches 405 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800 GTS is built on G9x while the RADEON E4690 uses GCN 3.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 2,048 (RADEON E4690).

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSRADEON E4690
G3D Mark Score
407
405
Architecture
G9x
GCN 3.0
Process Node
65 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
224
2048+814%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8800 GTS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON E4690 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSRADEON E4690
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8800 GTS has 321 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON E4690 carries 512 MB. RADEON E4690 gives you 59.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8800 GTS and 64-bit on the RADEON E4690.

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSRADEON E4690
VRAM Capacity
0.313 GB
0.5 GB+60%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8800 GTS draws 150W versus the RADEON E4690's 95W — a 44.9% difference. The RADEON E4690 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 350W (RADEON E4690). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSRADEON E4690
TDP
150W
95W-37%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
95°C
Perf/Watt
2.7
4.3+59%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8800 GTS came in at $449, while the RADEON E4690 launched at $558. On MSRP, GeForce 8800 GTS was 19.5% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 0.7 (RADEON E4690) — the GeForce 8800 GTS offers 28.6% better value. The newer card here is RADEON E4690 (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSRADEON E4690
MSRP
$449-20%
$558
Performance per Dollar
0.9+29%
0.7
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Amethyst
Release
July 15 2008
September 29 2015
Ranking
#825
#420

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.