
GeForce 8800 GTS vs RADEON HD6410D

GeForce 8800 GTS
Popular choices:

RADEON HD6410D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8800 GTS is positioned at rank 700 and the RADEON HD6410D is on rank 340, so the RADEON HD6410D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800 GTS
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON HD6410D is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The RADEON HD6410D likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8800 GTS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON HD6410D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.9% higher G3D Mark score and 59.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 321 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8800 GTS.
| Insight | GeForce 8800 GTS | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+59.7%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON HD6410D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $50 for the GeForce 8800 GTS, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 939.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8800 GTS | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+939.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8800 GTS and RADEON HD6410D

GeForce 8800 GTS
The GeForce 8800 GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 407 points.

RADEON HD6410D
The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8800 GTS scores 407 and the RADEON HD6410D reaches 423 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800 GTS is built on G9x while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 407 | 423+4% |
| Architecture | G9x | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 224+75% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8800 GTS comes with 321 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6410D has 512 MB. The RADEON HD6410D offers 59.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.313 GB | 0.5 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8800 GTS draws 150W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 15W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7 | 28.2+944% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8800 GTS launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the RADEON HD6410D launched at $35 and now averages $5. The RADEON HD6410D costs 90% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 84.6 (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 944.4% better value. The RADEON HD6410D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $35-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $5-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 84.6+944% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Dragon Range |
| Release | July 15 2008 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #825 | #843 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















