FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 8800 GTS Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 8800 GTS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 8800 GTS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M2000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅219.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 321 MB).
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 150W, a 107W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce 8800 GTS
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 321 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 321 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌49.7% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌248.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 43W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 8800 GTS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

GeForce 8800 GTS
The GeForce 8800 GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 407 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the GeForce 8800 GTS reaches 407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 8800 GTS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 224 (GeForce 8800 GTS).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 426+5% | 407 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+186% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8800 GTS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8800 GTS carries 321 MB. FirePro M2000 gives you 219.5% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M2000 and 64-bit on the GeForce 8800 GTS.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+219% | 0.313 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M2000) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GTS). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1+11% | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 4.2+27% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 6+200% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (FirePro M2000) vs No (GeForce 8800 GTS). Decoder: UVD 3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800 GTS).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the GeForce 8800 GTS's 150W — a 110.9% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (GeForce 8800 GTS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-71% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-32% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9+267% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M2000 came in at $300, while the GeForce 8800 GTS launched at $449. On MSRP, FirePro M2000 was 33.2% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (FirePro M2000) vs 0.9 (GeForce 8800 GTS) — the FirePro M2000 offers 55.6% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M2000 (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-33% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4+56% | 0.9 |
| Codename | Heathrow | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | July 1 2012 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #710 | #825 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















