GeForce 8800 GTS
VS
GeForce GT625M

GeForce 8800 GTS vs GeForce GT625M

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800 GTS

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT625M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8800 GTS is positioned at rank 700 and the GeForce GT625M is on rank 195, so the GeForce GT625M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800 GTS

#689
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
11931%
#691
10815%
#692
10787%
#696
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
9809%
#697
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
9742%
#699
Mobility Radeon HD 3450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#700
GeForce 8800 GTS
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
100%
#701
GeForce 7650 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
98%
#702
GeForce 8600M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#703
Mobility Radeon X1400
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
97%
#704
GeForce 8600 GT
MSRP: $159|Avg: $15
97%
#705
GeForce 7900 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
95%
#706
GeForce 6150SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
91%
#707
Mobility Radeon X1300
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
#708
Mobility Radeon X1350
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
#709
MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
88%
#710
GeForce 7900 GTX
MSRP: $499|Avg: $40
86%
#711
GeForce 6800 GS
MSRP: $249|Avg: $40
85%
#712
GeForce 6150
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
80%
#713
MOBILITY RADEON 9600
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
80%
#714
RADEON E4690
MSRP: $558|Avg: $558
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT625M

#185
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
386%
#187
350%
#188
349%
#192
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
317%
#193
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
315%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
100%
#197
100%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
96%
#206
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT625M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 59.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 321 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8800 GTS.

InsightGeForce 8800 GTSGeForce GT625M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)
Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+59.7%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT625M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT625M holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $50), it costs 10% less, resulting in a 15.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 8800 GTSGeForce GT625M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+15.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)
More affordable ($45)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8800 GTS and GeForce GT625M

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800 GTS

The GeForce 8800 GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 407 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT625M

The GeForce GT625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 422 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8800 GTS scores 407 and the GeForce GT625M reaches 422 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800 GTS is built on G9x while the GeForce GT625M uses Kepler, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 384 (GeForce GT625M).

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSGeForce GT625M
G3D Mark Score
407
422+4%
Architecture
G9x
Kepler
Process Node
65 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
224
384+71%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSGeForce GT625M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8800 GTS comes with 321 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT625M has 512 MB. The GeForce GT625M offers 59.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSGeForce GT625M
VRAM Capacity
0.313 GB
0.5 GB+60%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT625M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSGeForce GT625M
DirectX
10.0
12 (11_0)+20%
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GT625M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT625M).

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSGeForce GT625M
Encoder
No
No NVENC (Fermi)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8800 GTS draws 150W versus the GeForce GT625M's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GT625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 350W (GeForce GT625M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSGeForce GT625M
TDP
150W
45W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
95°C
75°C-21%
Perf/Watt
2.7
9.4+248%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT625M costs 10% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 9.4 (GeForce GT625M) — the GeForce GT625M offers 16% better value. The GeForce GT625M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTSGeForce GT625M
MSRP
$449
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$45-10%
Performance per Dollar
8.1
9.4+16%
Codename
NB9E-GTX
GK107
Release
July 15 2008
March 22 2012
Ranking
#825
#828