GeForce 8800 GTS vs Quadro FX 4600
GeForce 8800 GTS
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 4600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8800 GTS is positioned at rank 700 and the Quadro FX 4600 is on rank 404, so the Quadro FX 4600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800 GTS
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8800 GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 4600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 8800 GTS | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+139.6%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8800 GTS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8800 GTS holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8800 GTS | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8800 GTS and Quadro FX 4600
GeForce 8800 GTS
The GeForce 8800 GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 407 points.
Quadro FX 4600
The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8800 GTS scores 407 and the Quadro FX 4600 reaches 403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800 GTS is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 4600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4600).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 407 | 403 |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224+17% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8800 GTS comes with 321 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4600 has 768 MB. The Quadro FX 4600 offers 139.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.313 GB | 0.75 GB+140% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8800 GTS draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 4600's 150W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 4600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7 | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8800 GTS launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro FX 4600 launched at $1999 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (GeForce 8800 GTS) vs 8.1 (Quadro FX 4600) — the Quadro FX 4600 offers 0% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTS | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-78% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GT200B |
| Release | July 15 2008 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #825 | #884 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8800 GTS and Quadro FX 4600
