Quadro FX 4600 vs RADEON E4690

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4600 vs RADEON E4690 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4600 vs RADEON E4690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4600

2008

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (768 MB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON E4690 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
258.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$558 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $558 MSRP).
❌57.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 95W.

RADEON E4690

2015

Why buy it

✅23.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,441 less on MSRP ($558 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 260% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($558 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 150W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 768 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON E4690 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (405 vs 403), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 4600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 768 MB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON E4690 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,441 cheaper on MSRP at $558 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 260% (0.7 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON E4690 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 4600 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 4600 vs RADEON E4690 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4600

The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.

RADEON E4690

The RADEON E4690 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 405 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4600 scores 403 and the RADEON E4690 reaches 405 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON E4690 uses GCN 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 2,048 (RADEON E4690). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4600) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON E4690).

Feature	Quadro FX 4600	RADEON E4690
G3D Mark Score	403	405
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	2048+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS+786%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	64	128+100%
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 4600	RADEON E4690
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4600 has 768 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON E4690 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 4600 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4600 and 64-bit on the RADEON E4690. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4600) vs 512 KB (RADEON E4690) — the RADEON E4690 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 4600	RADEON E4690
VRAM Capacity	0.75 GB+50%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4600 draws 150W versus the RADEON E4690's 95W — a 44.9% difference. The RADEON E4690 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4600) vs 350W (RADEON E4690). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro FX 4600	RADEON E4690
TDP	150W	95W-37%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Perf/Watt	2.7	4.3+59%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 4600 came in at $1999, while the RADEON E4690 launched at $558. On MSRP, RADEON E4690 was 72.1% cheaper ($1441 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 0.7 (RADEON E4690) — the RADEON E4690 offers 250% better value. The newer card here is RADEON E4690 (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 4600	RADEON E4690
MSRP	$1999	$558-72%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	0.7+250%
Codename	GT200B	Amethyst
Release	November 11 2008	September 29 2015
Ranking	#884	#420

Search Quadro FX 4600 on Amazon

Search RADEON E4690 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.