Quadro FX 4600 vs RADEON HD6410D
Quadro FX 4600
Popular choices:
RADEON HD6410D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 4600 is positioned at rank 404 and the RADEON HD6410D is on rank 340, so the RADEON HD6410D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4600
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON HD6410D is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The RADEON HD6410D likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 4600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON HD6410D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 4600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4600 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON HD6410D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $50 for the Quadro FX 4600, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 949.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4600 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+949.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 4600 and RADEON HD6410D
Quadro FX 4600
The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.
RADEON HD6410D
The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 4600 scores 403 versus the RADEON HD6410D's 423 — the RADEON HD6410D leads by 5%. The Quadro FX 4600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4600) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 403 | 423+5% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 192+50% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 0.5632 TFLOPS+22% |
| ROPs | 24+500% | 4 |
| TMUs | 64+700% | 8 |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 2 MB+953% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 4600 comes with 768 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6410D has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 4600 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4600) vs 2 MB (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.75 GB+50% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 2 MB+953% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 4600 draws 150W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4600) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 15W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7 | 28.2+944% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 4600 launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the RADEON HD6410D launched at $35 and now averages $5. The RADEON HD6410D costs 90% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 84.6 (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 944.4% better value. The RADEON HD6410D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $35-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $5-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 84.6+944% |
| Codename | GT200B | Dragon Range |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #884 | #843 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 4600 and RADEON HD6410D
