Quadro FX 4600 vs RADEON HD6410D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4600 vs RADEON HD6410D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4600 vs RADEON HD6410D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4600

2008

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (768 MB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON HD6410D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
5611.4% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

RADEON HD6410D

2023

Why buy it

✅12.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,964 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 5894.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 768 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON HD6410D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5% in PassMark G3D (423 vs 403), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON HD6410D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 55nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON HD6410D makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,964 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5894.9% (12.1 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro FX 4600 vs RADEON HD6410D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4600

The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 4600 scores 403 versus the RADEON HD6410D's 423 — the RADEON HD6410D leads by 5%. The Quadro FX 4600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4600) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D).

Feature	Quadro FX 4600	RADEON HD6410D
G3D Mark Score	403	423+5%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	192+50%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	0.5632 TFLOPS+22%
ROPs	24+500%	4
TMUs	64+700%	8
L2 Cache	0.19 MB	2 MB+953%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 4600	RADEON HD6410D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4600 has 768 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6410D carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 4600 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4600 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6410D. L2 Cache: 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4600) vs 2 MB (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 4600	RADEON HD6410D
VRAM Capacity	0.75 GB+50%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.19 MB	2 MB+953%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4600 draws 150W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4600) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro FX 4600	RADEON HD6410D
TDP	150W	15W-90%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Perf/Watt	2.7	28.2+944%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 4600 came in at $1999, while the RADEON HD6410D launched at $35. On MSRP, RADEON HD6410D was 98.2% cheaper ($1964 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 12.1 (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 5950% better value. The newer card here is RADEON HD6410D (2023 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 4600	RADEON HD6410D
MSRP	$1999	$35-98%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	12.1+5950%
Codename	GT200B	Dragon Range
Release	November 11 2008	January 3 2023
Ranking	#884	#843

Search Quadro FX 4600 on Amazon

Search RADEON HD6410D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.