
Quadro FX 4600 vs Radeon HD 6550D

Quadro FX 4600
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6550D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 4600 is positioned at rank 404 and the Radeon HD 6550D is on rank 207, so the Radeon HD 6550D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6550D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 4600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (768 MB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6550D.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4600 | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 4600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 4600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $70), it costs 29% less, resulting in a 41.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4600 | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+41.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 4600 and Radeon HD 6550D

Quadro FX 4600
The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon HD 6550D
The Radeon HD 6550D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 400 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 4600 scores 403 and the Radeon HD 6550D reaches 400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6550D uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6550D). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4600) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6550D).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 403 | 400 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1408+633% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 2.253 TFLOPS+387% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 64 | 88+38% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 4600 comes with 768 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6550D has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 4600 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4600) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6550D) — the Radeon HD 6550D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.75 GB+50% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 4600 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6550D's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro FX 4600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4600) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6550D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7+35% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 4600 launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 6550D launched at $70 and now averages $70. The Quadro FX 4600 costs 28.6% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 5.7 (Radeon HD 6550D) — the Quadro FX 4600 offers 42.1% better value. The Radeon HD 6550D is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $70-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-29% | $70 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1+42% | 5.7 |
| Codename | GT200B | Cayman |
| Release | November 11 2008 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #884 | #623 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











